Back to samplesSample analysis · read-only preview

PE review required. Sample illustrative output. Every recommendation here must be reviewed and stamped by a licensed Professional Engineer before use in any bid commitment or construction document.

Salt Lake City, UT

Westside Apartments Soil-Nail Shoring Wall

Soil-nail shoring · 32 ft cut

STRONG fit$385K – $432K

Why bid: Soils, geometry, and cut depth are textbook for our soil-nail crew. Project location is within our standard service area and the GC has a prior relationship from the Bonneville Heights job we won in 2025.

Executive summary

Five-story podium apartment building requires a 32-foot temporary shoring wall along the north and east property lines to support 6-story neighboring structures and an active city sidewalk during basement excavation. Geotechnical investigation describes medium-dense silty sand grading to dense gravelly sand below 15 ft — favorable for hollow-bar soil nails. Two-tier installation with 8 ft horizontal and 5 ft vertical spacing meets the 1.5 FOS global stability requirement. Critical to confirm groundwater elevation; the September boring logs show dry conditions but the project is being bid for a March excavation start when seasonal high groundwater could reach the lower nail elevation.

Key findings
Soils favor hollow-bar nails — no pre-drilling required

Medium-dense silty sand to dense gravelly sand. Self-drilling hollow-bar nails (R32-280) installed in single pass; conventional grouted nails would also work but at lower production.

Cited · Geotech Report, Section 4.2
Adjacent 6-story buildings drive deflection limit

0.002H lateral deflection criterion at top of wall to protect neighboring structural integrity. Drives tighter horizontal nail spacing (8 ft vs typical 10 ft) in the upper tier.

Cited · Drawing S-302, Note 7
Spring groundwater could submerge bottom tier of nails

Bid window targets March excavation start, but boring logs are from September. Historical wells in the area show ~4 ft seasonal rise. Lower-tier nails may install through saturated soil.

Cited · Geotech Report, Appendix C
Recommended design
Primary system

Two-tier hollow-bar soil-nail wall with shotcrete facing

Wall length248 LF (combined N + E faces)
Total wall area7,936 SF
Nail count186 ea
Typical nailR32-280, 22 ft length
Shotcrete facing6 in. nominal, fiber-reinforced
Test program3 verification + 19 proof tests
Risk assessment

Seasonal groundwater higher than September boring conditions

HIGH
Geotechnical

Mitigation: Carry contingency for grout-loss premium below el. 4,232. Request supplemental boring with March observation well before NTP.

Neighboring building monitoring required — instrumentation unclear

MEDIUM
Scope

Mitigation: Spec calls for inclinometers and crack gauges but assigns no party. Confirm responsibility before bid; $25K swing.

Right-of-way encroachment requires city approval

MEDIUM
Permitting

Mitigation: Nail tail length extends ~6 ft into the public sidewalk subsurface. Standard SLC encroachment permit available but 4-week review.

Clarifications needed

Who provides and reads the inclinometers and crack gauges?

HIGH priority

Spec assigns instrumentation install to 'shoring contractor' but reading and reporting to 'owner-rep'. Unclear who funds the data tracker.

Confirm temporary wall life — 18 months or 24?

MEDIUM priority

Bid form says 18, spec section 02500 says 24. Affects corrosion protection requirement for hollow bars.

Cost drivers
Order-of-magnitude estimate$385K – $432K
  • Hollow-bar nail material — 186 nails × ~22 LF avg
  • Shotcrete labor and pumping
  • Encroachment permit review window
  • Optional dewatering allowance if spring boring confirms wet conditions

This is one of three sample analyses.

Bring a real geotech package and we'll run one for you free — no card required.